
Choosing dPCR vs. qPCR – Explore the benefits and see if it’s right for your research goals
When comparing dPCR vs. qPCR technologies, the key difference is precision power. While both offer highly sensitive and reliable nucleic acid detection and quantification, the key difference between the two technologies can be best described using an analog versus digital radio analogy, says Dr. Jim Huggett, Principal Scientist, National Measurement Laboratory. "With an analog radio, the dial must first be fine-tuned to get the desired station with the least interference. Still, the quality depends on reception and the signal is subject to interference from static. This is qPCR. It is reliable but requires optimization to get a good result, and even then, you must contend with background noise. With digital radio, you simply call up the station and it is either there, with a clear signal, or not. The latter is like dPCR, which provides precise, binary results. It literally counts the presence or absence of DNA molecules. The clarity of results combined with a low error rate makes for an incredibly high level of precision. Digital PCR is well-suited to measure smaller quantitative differences."
Compare and contrast: qPCR vs. dPCR
Real-time PCR/ qPCR | Digital PCR |
---|---|
Quantitative, relative or absolute but standard curves or reference samples needed |
Quantitative, absolute and no standards or references needed |
Bulk PCR
|
Sample partitioning
|
Measures PCR amplification at each cycle | Measures at the end of the PCR cycles |
Detects mutation rate at >1% | Detects mutation rate at ≥ 0.001% (high signal-to-noise ratio) |
Well-established protocols | Higher precision for higher reproducibility across laboratories |
When to use dPCR vs. qPCR?
When it comes to molecular biology and genomics research involving nucleic acid quantification, scientists often find themselves standing at the crossroads. Which quantification technique to choose to achieve research goals efficiently – the more precise and robust digital PCR (dPCR) or the more standardized and familiar quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Both technologies have similarities, but also their benefits and limitations that make the choice application-dependent.
The application grid indicates the suitability level of each technology for some of the common applications.
Researchers describe the benefits of dPCR over qPCR – See examples of a few studies that used dPCR to overcome the limitations of qPCR.
-
Guiding researchers with cutting edge dPCR technologyMogens Kruhøffer, founder and CEO, BioXpedia, sees the potential for technological advances in accelerating the research from idea to bedside for the benefit of patients. Their most recent addition to the lab, the QIAcuity, will allow their customers to provide better results even faster.
-
Cracking the malaria epidemiology code with dPCRSwitching from qPCR to dPCR enabled Dr. Wang Nguitragool to identify a few unknown samples which could not be identified by their standard assay.
-
Identifying the genetics behind obesity using dPCRDr. Johanna Andersson-Assarsson used dPCR to determine exact copy numbers of a highly variable obesity gene with a large number of copies as the resolution was just not good enough with qPCR.
-
Digital PCR reveals mutating COVID strainsWhen wastewater-based COVID-19 research was hindered by inherent technical issues of methods such as RT-qPCR and DNA sequencing, researchers at this French startup switched to dPCR, which not only enabled them to detect mutating strains early and reliably but also correlate the amount of SARS-CoV-2 detected in the wastewaters to the population infected.
Transitioning from qPCR to dPCR – The QIAcuity Nanoplate Digital PCR System makes it accessible and more affordable than ever to bring the power of dPCR to your lab.
Featured webinars
-
QIAGEN’s new dPCR portfolio – overcoming the current throughput, speed and usability bottlenecks in digital PCRSpeaker: Dr. Gerald Schock,
Director Digital PCR Instruments, QIAGEN -
Digital PCR using QIAGEN’s QIAcuity system: an introductionSpeaker: Andreas Missel,
Ph.D., Director R&D, QIAGEN -
Tips and tricks for more accurate digital PCRSpeaker: Dr. Mikael Kubista,
TATAA Biocenter AB and Department of Biotechnology Czech Academy of Sciences